![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 08:42:37PM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote: > > What really bugs me about this is that while normally you're hard to > > communicate with, this time you have actively _lied_ about the patches on > > IRC and in email about how they will cause IDE corruption etc due to > > timing changes. > > Before I truley reply to this statement above, would you like to recant it? > > > No such timing changes existed, and whenever you were asked about what was > > actually actively _wrong_ with the patches, you didn't reply. > > Here I question the taking of a patch 12 which altered the behavior of the > subsystem baseclock to setting up PIO timings for the executing command > block operations. I then looked over the patch again and saw you had not > taken it yet. > > In that private email, I clearly stated I made a mistake in reading what > was accepted into 2.5.5. The fact is you had not accepted it yet. > However I expect you will take it. Given that very few people in the > world have most of the hardware that was effected by that change, and even > less have the NDA documents on the rules, please accept the change. Maybe then you'll want to point out how patch #12 can change any PIO timings? I'm definitely curious ... that'd affect my VIA driver as well, you know ... -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:24 [W:0.286 / U:0.130 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||