[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: gcc-2.95.3 vs gcc-3.0.4
    Andrew Morton writes:
    > Larry McVoy wrote:
    > >
    > > Try 2.72, it's almost twice as fast as 2.95 for builds. For BK, at least,
    > > we don't see any benefit from the slower compiler, the code runs the same
    > > either way.
    > >
    > Amen.
    > I want back, but it was the name:value struct initialiser
    > bug which killed that off. 2.91.66 isn't much slower than 2.7.x,
    > and it's what I use.
    > "almost twice as fast"? That means that 2.7.2 vs 3.x is getting
    > up to a 3x difference. Does anyone know why?

    I'm less concerned about compilation speed than the fact that gcc
    2.95.3 generates buggy code. User-space code that used to work with
    gcc 2.7.2 and egcs 1.1.2 now doesn't. Blech.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.034 / U:1.528 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site