![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andrew Morton writes: > Larry McVoy wrote:> > > > Try 2.72, it's almost twice as fast as 2.95 for builds. For BK, at least, > > we don't see any benefit from the slower compiler, the code runs the same > > either way.> > > > Amen.> > I want 2.7.2.3 back, but it was the name:value struct initialiser > bug which killed that off. 2.91.66 isn't much slower than 2.7.x, > and it's what I use.> > "almost twice as fast"? That means that 2.7.2 vs 3.x is getting > up to a 3x difference. Does anyone know why? I'm less concerned about compilation speed than the fact that gcc 2.95.3 generates buggy code. User-space code that used to work with gcc 2.7.2 and egcs 1.1.2 now doesn't. Blech. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:24 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||