lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.5.5-pre1 IDE cleanup 9
    Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
    > On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 03:16:22PM +0100, Martin Dalecki wrote:
    > > > I think it'd be even better if the chipset drivers did the probing
    > > > themselves, and once they find the IDE device, they can register it with
    > > > the IDE core. Same as all the other subsystem do this.
    > >
    > > Well the lists are needed for quirk handling in the ide-pci.c code.
    > > But if it turns out to be possible - I'm all for it.
    >
    > I don't think so. If needed we can make some generic IDE_QUIRK_XXX
    > defines which then the chipset drivers can use where applicable, passing
    > them to the generic code.

    It depends on the quirk, really, whether you want the low-level chipset
    driver to set a flag that tells the IDE core to do something, or whether
    the low-level chipset driver handles the quirk (by a fixup in an IRQ
    routine or somesuch).

    Basically it's a case-by-case basis...

    --
    Jeff Garzik | "UNIX enhancements aren't."
    Building 1024 | -- says /usr/games/fortune
    MandrakeSoft |
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.022 / U:33.428 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site