Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 19 Feb 2002 12:09:51 -0800 | | From | Thomas Zimmerman <> | | Subject | Re: Ess Solo-1 interrupt behaviour |
| |
On 19-Feb 05:12, Samium Gromoff wrote: > " Alan Cox wrote:" > > > > > > Thats an esd bug. ESD tries to use ridiculously small fragment sizes > > > > > > > Wait, wait, but my ISA Vibra 16 generates 20+ times less interrupts, with the > > > _same_ esd! > > > > Yes. It has diff fragment limits > > > So the point is we should fix esd, not the solo-1 driver, i presume? > (esd_fixed -> irq_load_fixed -> disk_io_is_back)... sounds ok > > EOT > > regards, Samium Gromoff
It would be EOT, but there don't seem to _be_ any esd developers. I'd take a look but my C skills max out at about "hello world", and there wouldn't be anyone to make a new release (google couldn't find a esd homepage at least). Maybe the gnome/ximian folks are taking bug reports/fixes in their packages. Who knows? This has come up several times with nary a peep from a esd developer.
Thomas[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] |  |