Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Page table sharing | Date | Tue, 19 Feb 2002 00:59:13 +0100 |
| |
On February 18, 2002 08:04 pm, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > On February 18, 2002 09:09 am, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > Since copy_page_range would not copy shared page tables, I'm wrong to > > > point there. But __pte_alloc does copy shared page tables (to unshare > > > them), and needs them to be stable while it does so: so locking against > > > swap_out really is required. It also needs locking against read faults, > > > and they against each other: but there I imagine it's just a matter of > > > dropping the write arg to __pte_alloc, going back to pte_alloc again.
I'm not sure what you mean here, you're not suggesting we should unshare the page table on read fault are you?
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |