Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: 2.5.5-pre1: mounting NTFS partitions -t VFAT | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Date | Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:56:35 +0900 |
| |
Jos Hulzink <josh@stack.nl> writes:
> Hi Ogawa, > > Your patch seems to fix it more or less, not the way it should be > fixed, imho. Partitions other than FAT return bogus information, but > bogus is not always zero. Fortunately enough, one of those new if > statements returns an error, but this is a "works for me" > solution, not a decent one.
No, that patch are validity check for FAT, not for you.
> What lacks is a fingerprint detector, and iirc -long time ago- FAT has a > very easy to detect fingerprint. > > I'll dig into FAT documentation tonight.
I read the document repeatedly and did much tests. If you read the document, you may use BS_OEMName or BS_FilSysType, however, these don't have a meaning. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |