![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Jos Hulzink <josh@stack.nl> writes: > Hi Ogawa, > > Your patch seems to fix it more or less, not the way it should be > fixed, imho. Partitions other than FAT return bogus information, but > bogus is not always zero. Fortunately enough, one of those new if > statements returns an error, but this is a "works for me" > solution, not a decent one. No, that patch are validity check for FAT, not for you. > What lacks is a fingerprint detector, and iirc -long time ago- FAT has a > very easy to detect fingerprint. > > I'll dig into FAT documentation tonight. I read the document repeatedly and did much tests. If you read the document, you may use BS_OEMName or BS_FilSysType, however, these don't have a meaning. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:24 [W:0.740 / U:0.060 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||