lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Possible breakthrough in the CML2 logjam?
Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>:
> > I need you to tell Linus that your concerns have been met
> > and sponsor CML2 to go in, so I can stop perpetually re-fighting old
> > battles.
>
> That's a fine thing for anyone and everyone to say *after* they have
> used the system and like it.
>
> If you are asking for a blessing in advance, which is how I read that,
> I would think there is zero chance of that happening, it's not how work
> is done on the kernel.

We're talking about design objections here. Specific objections to actual
CML2 bugs, including rulebase and UI bugs, are a different level. What
I am asking is if Jeff will bless the *architecture* provided the global-
dependency issue is met.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.151 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site