lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Disgusted with kbuild developers
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

> On Saturday 16 February 2002 11:06 am, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > Don't tell us that's not doable. Do it and show us that you can do a
> > perfect translation of CML1 into CML2 with all CML1 structural flaws.
>
> "Hey, the new VM in 2.4.10 should have replicated the swap overload failure
> case in 2.4.9! The first implementation should definitely melt down exactly
> the same way! We need to artificially introduce all the flaws in the old
> one, just to prove it can be done! Otherwise the new code is not
> interesting."

Rob:

Please read my other mails, understand the nuances, then come back, OK?


Nicolas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site