[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Disgusted with kbuild developers
    On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Rob Landley wrote:

    > On Saturday 16 February 2002 11:06 am, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
    > > Don't tell us that's not doable. Do it and show us that you can do a
    > > perfect translation of CML1 into CML2 with all CML1 structural flaws.
    > "Hey, the new VM in 2.4.10 should have replicated the swap overload failure
    > case in 2.4.9! The first implementation should definitely melt down exactly
    > the same way! We need to artificially introduce all the flaws in the old
    > one, just to prove it can be done! Otherwise the new code is not
    > interesting."


    Please read my other mails, understand the nuances, then come back, OK?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:0.023 / U:4.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site