Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | | Subject | Re: linux-2.5.4-pre1 - bitkeeper testing | | Date | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 01:52:20 +0100 |
| |
On February 12, 2002 11:54 pm, Larry McVoy wrote: > And it's not like this makes arch bad, this is one place where it isn't as > good as some other choices. But arch has other areas where it is better, > it is less pedantic than most systems about what it will try and apply. > It's the uber patch library if you ask me, and that has real value. > Why the patchbot people haven't picked up on that is beyond me, they're > off trying to write something "simple", which I think you'll agree is > a strange, there is nothing simple about this problem space.
The patchbot people, at least one of them, is busy working on a totally unrelated problem ;-)
I'm keeping an eye on this. The patchbot version 1.0 will in fact be simple and useful at the same time or I'd better seriously consider retiring.
-- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |