Messages in this thread | | | From | David Mosberger <> | Date | Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:18:38 -0800 | Subject | Re: thread_info implementation |
| |
>>>>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:04:49 -0800 (PST), "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said:
DaveM> You don't have any facts, you just "think" it will slow DaveM> things down because of the pointer dereference. I challenge DaveM> you to show it actually shows up on the performance radar.
DaveM> The thing is going to be fully hot in the cache all the time, DaveM> there is no way you'll take a cache miss for this DaveM> dereference.
Let's see: on Itanium, a ld takes up an M slot and has a 2 cycle access latency (if in the first level cache). This may or may not be noticable in benchmarks, but it certainly won't go faster. And all this just for task coloring (which we can do with the old set up just fine)?
--david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |