Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:06:44 -0800 | From | "S. Parker" <> | Subject | Re: Sysrq enhancement: process kill facility |
| |
I certainly have no particular preference for what this is called. Is there support for dropping the existing kIll and me re-submitting these changes that way? (I've never imagined how kIll actually helped.)
Cheers,
~sparker
At 12:19 PM 2/9/2002 , Pavel Machek wrote: >Hi! > > > > > You enter <alt>-<sysrq>-n ("nuke"), and then prompts for the pid. It > > supports > > backspace and control-U. On serial ports, it retains the same semantics: > > a break activates this as a sysrq sequence, but if more than 5-seconds pass > > without any input, it drops out of processing input as a sysrq. > > > > Feedback welcome, please cc: me directly. > >Looks good to me; (maybe you could reuse from 'kIll' as killing of all >processes is hardly ever usefull). > Pavel >-- >(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the >U.S. >no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa
Cheers,
~sparker
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |