[lkml]   [2002]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Radix-tree pagecache for 2.5
    >>>>> "Ingo" == Ingo Molnar <> writes:

    Ingo> On 1 Feb 2002, Momchil Velikov wrote:
    >> So, we can use a read-write spinlock instead ->i_shared_lock, ok ?

    Ingo> using read-write locks does not solve the scalability problem: the problem
    Ingo> is the bouncing of the spinlock cacheline from CPU to CPU.

    Does cache line bounce (shared somewhere -> exclusive elsewhere) cost
    more that a simple miss (present nowhere -> exclusive somewhere) ?


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:16    [W:0.038 / U:51.808 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site