lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
Date
In article <200212090830.gB98USW05593@flux.loup.net>,
Mike Hayward <hayward@loup.net> wrote:
>
>I have been benchmarking Pentium 4 boxes against my Pentium III laptop
>with the exact same kernel and executables as well as custom compiled
>kernels. The Pentium III has a much lower clock rate and I have
>noticed that system call performance (and hence io performance) is up
>to an order of magnitude higher on my Pentium III laptop. 1k block IO
>reads/writes are anemic on the Pentium 4, for example, so I'm trying
>to figure out why and thought someone might have an idea.

P4's really suck at system calls. A 2.8GHz P4 does a simple system call
a lot _slower_ than a 500MHz PIII.

The P4 has problems with some other things too, but the "int + iret"
instruction combination is absolutely the worst I've seen. A 1.2GHz
Athlon will be 5-10 times faster than the fastest P4 on system call
overhead.

HOWEVER, the P4 is really good at a lot of other things. On average, a
P4 tends to perform quite well on most loads, and hyperthreading (if you
have a Xeon or one of the newer desktop CPU's) also tends to work quite
well to smooth things out in real life.

In short: the P4 architecture excels at some things, and it sucks at
others. It _mostly_ tends to excel more than suck.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site