![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Grover, Andrew wrote: > In order to solve this, we are considering releasing the Linux version of > the interpreter under a dual license. This would allow direct incorporation > of changes. Any patches submitted against the ACPI core code would > implicitly be allowed to be used by us in a non-GPL context. This is already > done elsewhere in the Linux kernel source by the PCMCIA code, for example. I think this is great. Since pcmcia already set an example with their license, I think it's a great model to follow. I also echo other comments to choose an already-known license like the MPL or BSD (etc.) so that lawyers don't have extra work ;-) Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31 [W:0.265 / U:1.110 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||