[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] kmalloc_percpu -- 2 of 2
    On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 08:32:58PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
    >>> Where in the kernel is such a large number of 4-, 8- or 16-byte
    >>> objects being used?

    On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:23:29PM +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
    > > Well, kernel objects may not be that small, but one would expect
    > > the per-cpu parts of the kernel objects to be sometimes small, often down to
    > > a couple of counters counting statistics.

    On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:23:12AM -0700, wrote:
    > Doesn't your allocator increase chances of cache conflict on the same
    > cpu ?

    This is so; I'm personally far more concerned about ZONE_NORMAL space
    consumption in the cacheline aligned case.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.018 / U:6.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site