![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:07:11PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, george anzinger wrote: > > > > As a suggestion for a solution for this, is it true that > > regs, on a system call, will ALWAYS be at the end of the > > stack? > > No. Some architectures do not save enough state on the stack by default, > and need to do more to use do_signal(). Look at alpha, for example - the > default kernel stack doesn't contain all tbe registers needed, and > the alpha do_signal() calling convention is different. > > If you want to handle do_signal(), then you need to do _all_ of this in > architecture-specific files. You simply cannot do what you want to do in a > generic way. I think you should be able to call do_signal or a wrapper in some platform-independent way. Is the necessary information recoverable in Alpha et al.? What do you think of adding a standard wrapper function so that system calls can process a signal if necessary? Not only did George need this for POSIX conformance, I've seen a lot of complaints about GDB interrupting sys_nanosleep even on cancelled signals. -- Daniel Jacobowitz MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.130 / U:0.420 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||