Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: holy grail | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | 30 Dec 2002 13:30:37 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 2002-12-30 at 01:32, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Yes, but there are more applications than improving overall uptime. > E.g. during development or other testing, it would be convenient to > be able to switch back and forth between distinct kernels, without > necessarily taking down the entire machine. Likewise for trivial > hardware changes.
Suspend to disk Change hardware Resume
That much sort of works. An Intel guy wrote a very simple piece of code I need to clean up into Linux format which rescans the pci bus and generates insert/remove events for any device that took a walk.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |