lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 30 Dec 2002 11:29:11 +0000
FromDave Jones <>
SubjectRe: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 10:37:06PM +0200, Ville Herva wrote:

 > > SYSCALL is AMD.  SYSENTER is Intel, and is likely to be significantly
 > Now that Linus has killed the dragon and everybody seems happy with the
 > shiny new SYSENTER code, let just add one more stupid question to this
 > thread: has anyone made benchmarks on SYSCALL/SYSENTER/INT80 on Athlon? Is
 > SYSCALL worth doing separately for Athlon (and perhaps Hammer/32-bit mode)?

Its something I wondered about too. Even if it isn't a win for K7,
it's possible that the K6 family may benefit from SYSCALL support.
Maybe even the K5 if it was around that early ? (too lazy to check pdf's)

		Dave

-- 
| Dave Jones.        http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:32    [from the cache]
©2003-2008