[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4
    On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:09:42PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
    > >>please try with my tree.
    > >
    > >It is greatly improved. It is still not as smooth as the standard 2.4
    > >scheduler, but I'd characterise it as "a bit jerky" rather than "makes
    > >me want to punch a hole in the monitor".
    > >
    > >The difference is unlikely to be noticed by many. (But it should be
    > >_better_ than stock 2.4)
    > ...
    > >>can you reproduce with my tree?
    > >
    > >Again, hugely improved over normal O(1) behaviour, but not as responsive
    > >as the stock 2.4 scheduler.
    > Andrea, which patches in your tree are the ones that fix this?
    > If it's the big-monster one ... any chance you could split out
    > the bits actually fix it? I'd love to be able to apply your fixes
    > to 2.5 and try them there ....

    it's all in these patches:

    andrea@dualathlon:~/remote/> ls -1 *sched*

    I'm fixing the RT case too right now, in a few days a further fix will
    be available to avoid deadlocks of some app with RT enabled.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.062 / U:141.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site