[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] set_cpus_allowed() for 2.4
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:09:42PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >>please try with my tree.
> >
> >It is greatly improved. It is still not as smooth as the standard 2.4
> >scheduler, but I'd characterise it as "a bit jerky" rather than "makes
> >me want to punch a hole in the monitor".
> >
> >The difference is unlikely to be noticed by many. (But it should be
> >_better_ than stock 2.4)
> ...
> >>can you reproduce with my tree?
> >
> >Again, hugely improved over normal O(1) behaviour, but not as responsive
> >as the stock 2.4 scheduler.
> Andrea, which patches in your tree are the ones that fix this?
> If it's the big-monster one ... any chance you could split out
> the bits actually fix it? I'd love to be able to apply your fixes
> to 2.5 and try them there ....

it's all in these patches:

andrea@dualathlon:~/remote/> ls -1 *sched*

I'm fixing the RT case too right now, in a few days a further fix will
be available to avoid deadlocks of some app with RT enabled.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.045 / U:7.228 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site