lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 03 Dec 2002 18:48:03 +0100
FromGiacomo Catenazzi <>
SubjectRe: Large block device patch, part 1 of 9
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:> >>>> kprintf would be better> >  >> > Why?  We don't have, say, kstrcpy() or ksscanf() for other functions 
> that are library-equivalent.

k to remember people that it is not the std function, thus not a write to
the standard output. I see more like fprintf (file) and [v]sprintf (string),
we write to a special buffer ("klog").
But if we don't move the verbosity level out of string, also the simple
'printf' would be fine.

ciao
	giacomo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008