Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:19:43 +0000 | From | Andrew Walrond <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] make i2c use initcalls everywhere |
| |
Agreed. I would love to see the i2c and lmsensor stuff properly maintained in the kernel tree; It would save a whole lot of dicking around.
Pretty please? ;)
J.A. Magallon wrote: > On 2002.12.29 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >>On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 11:26:28PM +0100, J.A. Magallon wrote: >> >>>Wil this reach the i2c maintainer or the next auto-generated patch from i2c >>>2.8.x will undo what you do now and will be sized 4Gb ? >> >>There is no maintainer for drivers/i2c/. The only updates it every got >>was me syncinc with their releases and backing out obvious braindamage. >> >> >>>Will this be accepted if I submit it, even independently of the maintainer ? >>>Because I suppose (???) that maintainer is sending changes and they are going >>>to trash... >> >>Maybe the changes the maintainers of the external i2c code are sending >>_are_ trash? >> > > > (just put on the flame war suit...) > > Stupid question: why people on http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/ is not > smashed with a hammer on the head and 'morally forced' to post, comment, etc. > patches on LKML ? They continue to ship releases, every vendor tracks them, > and every vendor has to correct changes they have not tracked from mainline, > like that old about __exit functions, and now initcalls... > > I really do not understand some things about Linux. Some people look like > living in alternative universes... >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |