![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> > I was astonished to see that the resulting signal is a white-noise > > pattern with a slight emphasis at the high end (when sampled at 44 > > kilosamples per second). In short, it looks like diode noise with a > > 4 kilohertz square wave thrown in. > > "That suggests to me that this would make a fair source of random samples, > > especially after you slot out the interfering signal. > JB> How can you guarantee that you are sampling noise, though, what if a > JB> sound card was picking up 50 Hz mains hum, for example, that would > JB> de-randomise the data quite a bit. > > Well, the 50hz from the mains isn't a perfect 50hz; it has random (yes) > fluctuations. Yes, that's true. More generally, though, is there any point in this going in to the mainline kernel, if: * Most users don't need faster entropy generation than we've got and * The entropy gathered from the soundcard is statistically inferior to that gathered from the current sources of entropy. I don't see how it's possible to guarantee that the data below a certain dB level from the soundcard is noise. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.178 / U:0.140 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||