![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Jeff Dike wrote: > This is a large patch, but > it's all under arch/um and include/asm-um > a lot of it is code movement Pulled, but that /proc/mm crap has to go (it wasn't in this patch, or I would have rejected it). What are the semantics the host code wants/needs, and how can we implement a sane generic mechanism that doesn't involve opening magic files? Having co-processes isn't wrong in itself, I just want the support to be clean and generic, instead of a huge hack. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.225 / U:0.240 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||