lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 25 Dec 2002 22:35:16 -0800 (PST)
FromJosh Brooks <>
SubjectRE: CPU failures ... or something else ?
Well, that's the thing - I _didn't_ switch cpus.  Sometimes the error is
cpu 0, sometimes it is cpu 1.



On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:

> > usually it says proc #1 in the error, but
> > the first time it said proc #0 - is that
> > interesting ?
>
> proc 0 and proc 1 are CPU 0 and CPU 1, respectively.  If you switched CPU's
> and now the error is on the other proc, then it IS a CPU error.
>
> Joseph Wagner
>
> P.S.  In hindsight, I probably should have read the entire thread before
> responding.  8-)  You live you learn.
>
> Joseph Wagner
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31    [W:0.171 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans