![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On 21 December 2002 19:18, Con Kolivas wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > osdl hardware, contest results, 2.5.52-mm2 with scheduler tunable - > exit weight (ew1= exit weight ==1 and so on) > > io_load: > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > ew0 [5] 105.3 90 16 22 2.91 > ew1 [5] 86.4 97 12 18 2.39 > ew2 [5] 74.9 109 9 18 2.07 > ew3 [5] 84.2 100 11 19 2.33 > ew4 [5] 83.8 102 10 18 2.31 > ew5 [5] 89.9 93 12 20 2.48 > ew6 [5] 97.5 88 13 20 2.69 > ew7 [5] 89.2 95 12 20 2.46 In spite of worrying reports of decreasing single task performance, does it make sense to add "null_load" test? ;) -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31 [W:0.142 / U:0.160 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||