lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation
FromAlan Cox <>
Date25 Dec 2002 21:43:08 +0000
On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 17:00, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This was an issue with gcc 2.96 on a 64-way IA64 box.  I don't have
> access to one at the moment, but as I remember, without the 2.4 changes:
> 
> -       ((p)->cpus_runnable & (p)->cpus_allowed & (1 << cpu))
> +       ((p)->cpus_runnable & (p)->cpus_allowed & (1UL << cpu))
> 
> nothing would get scheduled on CPUs 32-63.  I guess those changes
> aren't controversial, though.

Is this a C quirk or a compiler bug ? 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008