![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > At David Mosberger's suggestion can we use this new version of > compat_jiffies_to_clock_t? It does better rounding and will not fail > if COMPAT_USER_HZ > HZ. I don't like using "long long" and divisions. Since this code is currently only used for 64-bit targets, is there any reason to use "long long" at all, and not just use "long"? I can see a 64-bit target where "long long" would be 128 bits, and this would do the wrong thing. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31 [W:0.144 / U:0.500 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||