lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 22 Dec 2002 13:33:37 +0100 (MET)
FromMikael Pettersson <>
SubjectRe: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 11:23:08 +0100 (CET), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>while reviewing the sysenter trampoline code i started wondering about the
>HT case. Dont HT boxes share the MSRs between logical CPUs? This pretty
>much breaks the concept of per-logical-CPU sysenter trampolines. It also
>makes context-switch time sysenter MSR writing impossible, so i really
>hope this is not the case.

Some MSRs are shared, some aren't. One must always check this in
the IA32 Volume 3 manual. The three SYSENTER MSRs are not shared.

However, no-one has yet proven that writing to these in the context
switch path has acceptable performance -- remember, there is _no_
a priori reason to assume _anything_ about performance on P4s,
you really do need to measure things before taking design decisions.

Manfred had a version with fixed MSR values and the varying data
in memory. Maybe that's actually faster.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008