![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
> > Is there any risk using -O3 instead of -O2 to compile the kernel, and why? > * It might uncover subtle bugs that would otherwise not occur. I wonder: for the sake of performance and good use of the precious clock- cycles, shouldn't there be made a start of fixing those bugs? Assuming that the bugs you're talking about are not compiler-bugs, they *are* bugs in the code that should be fixed, shouldn't they? > * Compiling with unusual options means that less people will know about > any problems it causes you. So, let's make it -O6 per default for 2.7.x/3.1.x? Folkert www.vanheusden.com/Linux - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||