![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
jreiser@BitWagon.com said: > In order to prevent races between valgrind for UML and kernel > allocators which valgrind does not "know", then the VALGRIND_* > declarations being added to kernel allocators should allow for > expressing the concept "atomically change state in both allocator and > valgrind". What are you talking about? There are no atomicity problems between UML and valgrind. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31 [W:0.348 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||