lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Valgrind meets UML
DateSat, 21 Dec 2002 11:05:25 -0500
FromJeff Dike <>
jeremy@goop.org said:
> The main problem will be that newly allocated memory will still be
> considered initialized by its previous owner.  Also, if UML allocates
> memory using mmap, all memory will be considered to be initialized.

What I was doing was having kfree and free_pages set the freed object to
noaccess.  Presumably, that tells valgrind to consider the memory 
uninitialized.

Presumably, that will also cause errors from inside the allocator if it
touches that memory at all before it's allocated again.

				Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31    [W:0.150 / U:0.050 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans