![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
george anzinger wrote: > > ... > > The logical thing is to implement arch_consoles_callable(). Does > > this look workable? > > I am not sure. The first question is when does the online > bit get set for cpu 0. Too late, probably. We might need an escape clause for the boot CPU there. > The next is that it does inhibit a > rather large block of printks. Is this ok? They get buffered, so the info will come out eventually. But we do want it to come out in a timely manner. > Mind you, I have not tried it yet... I think it's the right approach. I can take poke at it if you like. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31 [W:0.734 / U:0.080 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||