lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Fix CPU bitmask truncation
FromAndreas Schwab <>
DateFri, 20 Dec 2002 21:00:23 +0100
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> writes:

|> On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 04:17, Andreas Schwab wrote:
|> > This is useless.  Assigning -1 to any unsigned type is garanteed to give
|> > you all bits one, and with two's complement this also holds for any signed
|> > type.
|> 
|> Only if the -1 is the same size as the unsigned type.  Otherwise it will
|> be 0-extended.

Wrong.  Unsigned arithmetics is defined as modulo MAX+1, and -1 equals MAX
modulo MAX+1 for every MAX.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [W:0.425 / U:0.150 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans