Messages in this thread | | | From | John Bradford <> | Subject | Re: Dedicated kernel bug database | Date | Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:48:53 +0000 (GMT) |
| |
[CC list trimmed]
> > I've got loads of ideas about how we could build a better bug database > > Go ahead, knock yourself out. Come back when you're done.
Not sure what you mean. I do intend to start coding a new bug database system today, and I'll announce it on the list when it's ready. If nobody likes it, I wasted my time.
> > - for example, we have categories at the moment in Bugzilla. Why? We > > already have a MAINTAINERS file, so say somebody looks up the relevant > > maintainer in that list, finds them, then goes to enter a bug in > > Bugzilla. Now they have to assign it to a category, and different > > people may well assign the same bug to different categories - > > immediately making duplicate detection more difficult. > > Have you actually looked at the maintainers file?
Yes.
> It's a twisted mess of outdated information,
Then it should be updated, that is nothing to do with Bugzilla.
> in no well formated order.
Looks easy enough to parse with regular expressions to me.
> The category list in Bugzilla was an attempt to bring some sanity to > the structure,
By adding an extra layer of abstraction. I don't agree that that helps.
> though I won't claim it's perfect. We really need a 3-level tree, > but that's a fair amount of work to code.
I disagree, (that we need a 3-level tree).
John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |