Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Dec 2002 19:04:01 +0100 (MET) | From | Mikael Pettersson <> | Subject | Re: 2.4.21-pre1 broke the ide-tape driver |
| |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 18:08:15 -0200 (BRST), Marcelo Tosatti wrote: >> - ide-disk/ide-floppy do the test&call inside the loop rather than after, >> so possibly the call should be moved into the loop, and augmented >> to be "if (drive && drive->proc) ide_remove_proc_entries(...)". > >Yes... here is a patch which moves the ide_remove_proc_entries inside the >detection loop. Without ide_remove_proc_entries inside the loop we would >also not unregister more than one device /proc entries, too. > >Please test it, works for me.
Tested. Works for me too.
/Mikael
> >--- linux-bk/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c 2002-12-19 18:05:07.000000000 -0200 >+++ linux-2.4.21/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c 2002-12-19 17:59:39.000000000 -0200 >@@ -6597,14 +6597,16 @@ > > for (minor = 0; minor < MAX_HWIFS * MAX_DRIVES; minor++) { > drive = idetape_chrdevs[minor].drive; >- if (drive != NULL && idetape_cleanup(drive)) >- printk(KERN_ERR "ide-tape: %s: cleanup_module() " >- "called while still busy\n", drive->name); >- } >+ if (drive) { >+ if (idetape_cleanup(drive)) >+ printk(KERN_ERR "ide-tape: %s: cleanup_module() " >+ "called while still busy\n", drive->name); > #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS >- if (drive->proc) >- ide_remove_proc_entries(drive->proc, idetape_proc); >+ if (drive->proc) >+ ide_remove_proc_entries(drive->proc, idetape_proc); > #endif >+ } >+ } > > ide_unregister_module(&idetape_module); > } > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |