![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 20:11, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Marcelo, what are the chances of getting this merged into mainline > > in the 2.4.20 timeframe? > > Ingo vetoed it. I did too. I know the distributors (including the one I work for) want it, but its a big change and very much a 2.5 thing. I would not be against tuning the 2.4 scheduler, though. But the changes to architecture-dependent code mean it may not even work on one or two architectures (i.e. cris, maybe?) and so I am against the whole O(1) scheduler and all of that supporting code for 2.4 proper. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.278 / U:0.010 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||