lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 20 Dec 2002 01:47:37 +0000
FromNuno Silva <>
SubjectRe: Horrible drive performance under concurrent i/o jobs (dlh problem?)
Hello!

Torben Frey wrote:

[..snip..]

> watching "vmstat 1" in another window - and this is what surprised me:
> when I stopped the copy job, there were 22 more seconds when data was
> still written to the backup software raid. Is this a hint where the
> problem could be? I have the same "feature" when I write to my 3ware.
> 

[..snip..]

AFAIK, this is because you have some GB of memory (RAM) that are beeing 
used as disk-cache. It took 22 seconds for the cached writes-to-disk 
being flushed to the device.

If 22 seconds is too much for the amount of cached disk-writes is 
another story :)

Maybe 3ware controllers are slow with many disks? Try the same with only 
3 disks to eliminate this variable.

Regards,
Nuno Silva

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [W:0.116 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans