[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Dedicated kernel bug database
    John Bradford wrote:
    >>And what about GNATS? What about the others on
    >> ? A number of those address
    >>the web-based concern. Do any of them answer your other concerns? If
    >>there are, where do those fail that bugzilla, GNATS, etc. get it right?
    > Why are you so against somebody sitting down and thinking, "OK, we
    > need a bug tracking database designed for debugging the Linux
    > kernel."? I don't understand why you think it's a bad idea to start
    > over. If my code was rubbish, then it wouldn't get used, and I wasted
    > my time. Nobody else suffers.

    I'm not against someone starting over. I'm against someone starting
    over without considering the existing base of code. If for no other
    reason than to see what worked for others and what didn't. A solid
    comparison of bugzilla, GNATS, and maybe a couple others with pros and
    cons for each can be extremely enlightening.... even if you decide none
    of them have a good, solid design.

    My questions were an attempt to get at that comparison so that there was
    evidence that you knew the pitfalls of more than just bugzilla. And I
    hoped that you might find another one that got some of those things right.

    >>But I see that starting from scratch is just the way you work:
    > Well, since it's me that's offering to write the code, don't I get to
    > decide how to write it?

    Absolutely! I'm just trying to get you to step back from 'rewrite it!'
    as an initial assumption, and look at what already exists. Maybe every
    wheel invented so far has 3 to 8 sides and we need to consider something
    other than a polygon. Or maybe there is an oval out there that hints at
    a better way. I'm just wanting to see that you have looked at more than
    the square wheel.

    > Besides, I'm not the only person who thinks it's a good idea to start
    > over sometimes - Eric Raymond even addresses this point in The
    > Cathedreal and the Bazaar.

    Yes, but I didn't see much of an explanation of _why_ nothing out there
    was a good starting point. Nor did I see an indication that you had
    gone and looked at more than just bugzilla.

    >>Well, have fun, good luck, and I do hope you come up with something
    >>useful and maintainable.
    > If not, I will admit you were right to the list :-).

    *chuckle* I think you are _premature_ in saying "rewrite!", not _wrong_
    in saying "rewrite!" And I will by no means tell you to sit and twiddle
    your thumbs instead of writing something, even if I think that something
    already exists in perfect form. (Which in this case, I don't. :) )

    Have fun!

    --------------------. "If it ain't broke now,
    Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram
    eli.carter(a) `-------------------------------------------------

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.026 / U:8.268 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site