![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>>>> On 20 Dec 2002 02:54:28 +0000, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> said: Alan> On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 21:37, Grant Grundler wrote: >> Martin, In April 2002, turukawa@icc.melco.co.jp sent a 2.4.x >> patch to disable BARs while the BARs were being sized. I've >> "forward ported" this patch to 2.5.x (appended). turukawa's >> excellent problem description and original posting are here: >> https://lists.linuxia64.org/archives//linux-ia64/2002-April/003302.html >> >> David Mosberger agrees this is an "obvious fix". We've been >> using this in the ia64 2.4 code stream since about August. Alan> We've rejected this twice already from different people. Alan> Nothing says your memory can't be behind the bridge and you Alan> just turned memory access off. Whoops bang, game over. Alan> And yes this happens on some PC class systems. And yet it's OK to remap that memory? That seems unlikely. --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||