[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:04, Con Kolivas wrote:

> Thanks. That looks fair enough. My only concern is that io_load performance is
> worse with lower prio_bonus_ratio settings and io loads are the most felt.
> I was thinking of changing what it varied. I was going to leave the timeslice
> fixed and use it to change the prio_bonus_ratio under load. Although that
> kind of defeats the purpose of having it in the first place since it is
> supposed to decide what is interactive under load?


You want to find good defaults that just work.

Robert Love

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.177 / U:3.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site