lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
FromRobert Love <>
Date19 Dec 2002 19:16:16 -0500
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:04, Con Kolivas wrote:

> Thanks. That looks fair enough. My only concern is that io_load performance is 
> worse with lower prio_bonus_ratio settings and io loads are the most felt.
> 
> I was thinking of changing what it varied. I was going to leave the timeslice 
> fixed and use it to change the prio_bonus_ratio under load. Although that 
> kind of defeats the purpose of having it in the first place since it is 
> supposed to decide what is interactive under load?

Yep.

You want to find good defaults that just work.

	Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [W:3.168 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans