[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio
    On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:04, Con Kolivas wrote:

    > Thanks. That looks fair enough. My only concern is that io_load performance is
    > worse with lower prio_bonus_ratio settings and io loads are the most felt.
    > I was thinking of changing what it varied. I was going to leave the timeslice
    > fixed and use it to change the prio_bonus_ratio under load. Although that
    > kind of defeats the purpose of having it in the first place since it is
    > supposed to decide what is interactive under load?


    You want to find good defaults that just work.

    Robert Love

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.021 / U:10.888 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site