lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 18 Dec 2002 17:24:53 -0800
FromWilliam Lee Irwin III <>
SubjectRe: [Lse-tech] Re: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?!
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 04:53:45PM -0800, Till Immanuel Patzschke wrote:
>> forgot the kernel version (2.4.20aa1)...

On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 05:15:41PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> 2.4.20aa1 is missing some of the infrastructure to reduce the cpu
> consumption under high process count loads, but that's not going to
> help you anyway. 150K processes is not going to be feasible in the
> immediate future (months or longer away) so you'll have to figure out
> how to take that into account.

Er, sorry, on a brief rereading my eyes deceived me and I thought an
extra zero got in there. 15K is fine on 2.5 + patches.


Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31    [W:0.416 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans