Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Benchmark] AIM9 results | Date | Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:47:43 -0800 | From | Cliff White <> |
| |
> Andrew Morton wrote: > > >Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > >>Hans Reiser wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Andrew and Chris, are these changes in performance definitely due to VM > >>>changes (and not some difference I am not thinking of between 2.5 and > >>>2.4 reiserfs code)? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>aim9 is just doing > >> > >> for (lots) > >> close(creat(filename)) > >> > >> > > unlink(filename); /* of course */ > > > > > > > > > Oh, commercial fs vendors must really love tuning for this benchmark.... > sigh.... > Ya, we think the AIM stuff is getting a little old. The basic idea is fine, but many of the tests do _very little work. We (OSDL) would like to re-do AIM9+7 and make it more useful. We'd love to have some input from everyone.... For example, how big a file should we create for a real creat() test ? cliffw
> Hans > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |