![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Georg Nikodym wrote: > Incidentally, a colleague claimed to have seem this behaviour on a > non-rmap 2.4.20. > 1. Known behaviour? > 2. Is there any data that I should be collecting that people are > interested in? > 3. Or should I just go back to 2.4.19-rmap14b (which did not trouble me > in this way)? The suspect is the disk elevator, which isn't scheduling requests in a way to cause lower read latency, but is optimised more for throughput. This results in some pauses. I'll need to look into it. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/ Current spamtrap: <a href=mailto:"october@surriel.com">october@surriel.com</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [W:0.110 / U:0.850 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||