[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance
Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 10:57:29AM -0800, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>>But this is exactly what I expect to happen. If you want to implement
>>gettimeofday() at user-level you need to modify the page. Some of the
>>information the kernel has to keep for the thread group can be stored in
>>this place and eventually be used by some uerlevel code executed by
>>jumping to 0xfffff000 or whatever the address is.
> You don't actually need to modify the page, rather the data for the user
> level gettimeofday needs to be in a shared page and some register (like
> %tr) must expose the current cpu number to index into the data. Either
> way, it's an internal implementation detail for the kernel to take care
> of, with multiple potential solutions.

That's not the problem... the problem is that the userland code can get
preempted at any time and rescheduled on another CPU.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.220 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site