![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 19:12, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > The complexity only applies to nonsynchronized TSCs though, I would > assume. I believe x86-64 uses a vsyscall using the TSC when it can > provide synchronized TSCs, and if it can't it puts a normal system call > inside the vsyscall in question. For x86-64 there is the hpet timer, which is a lot saner but I don't think we can mmap it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:31 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||