Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Dec 2002 16:10:49 -0600 | From | Brandon Low <> | Subject | Re: procps 2.x vs. procps 3.x |
| |
> If nobody else knows about it, it's not too likely to get fixed. > Send bug reports to procps-feedback@lists.sf.net please. > Sorry about that, sent bug report and link to our bug track on it.
> Before you do: "certain characters" will need some explaining. > (position? value? completely gone or turned into a space?)
In the bug report. > > > but the 3.x series is much prettier and > > feature rich than the 2.x series. On the other hand, 2.x is > > consistently more up to date with kernel changes since RML and Riel > > maintain it and are intimately familiar with current kernel > > development. > > I just got the last bit, /proc/*/wchan usage on 2.5.xx kernels. > Oddly, I'm ahead right now. I have a vmstat that uses a fast O(1) > algorithm on 2.5.xx kernels and reports the IO-wait time. I also > have a sysctl that handles the 2.5.xx VLAN interfaces.
Amazing work, thanks! I hope to get your procps into Gentoo Stable RSN :)
--Brandon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |