lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Symlink indirection
    Pete,

    Sorry for being dense, but what do you mean by 'bindings' ? Hard links?

    Andrew

    > Frankly, all cases when I had seen the nested symlink farms of that
    > depth would be better served by use of bindings - these are not subject
    > to any limits on nesting and avoid a lot of PITA inherent to symlink
    > farms. To put it another way, nested symlink farms grow from attempts
    > to work around the lack of bindings. It's not that you need to replace
    > all symlinks with bindings, of course - the crown of the tree is usually
    > OK, it's the trunk that acts as source of pain.


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:31    [W:0.021 / U:0.024 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site