![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
I see that find_next_zero_bit() has a first arg of void* in about half of the archs and unsigned long* in the rest (incl asm-i386/bitops.h). Looking at incompatable pointer type warnings in a recent compile, I found one where the caller was passing a u64*, thus the error. Should all of the archs use a void* for this, or is there some reason not to? test_and_set_bit() and test_and_clear_bit() also have the same issue. -JimC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 11:31 [W:2.610 / U:0.050 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | ||||||||||