lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: NUMA scheduler BK tree
Date
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 19:10, Michael Hohnbaum wrote:
> > Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the
> > core and the initial load balancer separate?
>
> This is fine with me. Can't the core changes and and load
> balancer be maintained as separate changesets within the bk
> tree?

OK, I'll do that. Any idea how I can apply a changeset which has
another name attached to it than mine?

Regards,
Erich

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans