Messages in this thread |  | | | From | Erich Focht <> | | Subject | Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree | | Date | Fri, 8 Nov 2002 00:05:30 +0100 |
| |
On Wednesday 06 November 2002 19:10, Michael Hohnbaum wrote: > > Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the > > core and the initial load balancer separate? > > This is fine with me. Can't the core changes and and load > balancer be maintained as separate changesets within the bk > tree?
OK, I'll do that. Any idea how I can apply a changeset which has another name attached to it than mine?
Regards, Erich
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |