Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: NUMA scheduler BK tree | From | Michael Hohnbaum <> | Date | 06 Nov 2002 10:10:42 -0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 08:34, Erich Focht wrote: > Michael, Martin, > > in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've > set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at > bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched > (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/) > This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra > trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our > NUMA scheduler. > > Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the > core and the initial load balancer separate? > > The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and > I'll try to keep so.
Erich,
This is fine with me. Can't the core changes and and load balancer be maintained as separate changesets within the bk tree?
Michael
> Regards, > Erich --
Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486 hohnbaum@us.ibm.com T/L 775-5486
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |