lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2002]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: NUMA scheduler BK tree
From
Date
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 08:34, Erich Focht wrote:
> Michael, Martin,
>
> in order to make it easier to keep up with the main Linux tree I've
> set up a bitkeeper repository with our NUMA scheduler at
> bk://numa-ef.bkbits.net/numa-sched
> (Web view: http://numa-ef.bkbits.net/)
> This used to contain my node affine NUMA scheduler, I'll add extra
> trees when the additional patches for that are tested on top of our
> NUMA scheduler.
>
> Is it ok for you to have it this way or would you prefer having the
> core and the initial load balancer separate?
>
> The tree is currently in sync with bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 and
> I'll try to keep so.

Erich,

This is fine with me. Can't the core changes and and load
balancer be maintained as separate changesets within the bk
tree?

Michael

> Regards,
> Erich
--

Michael Hohnbaum 503-578-5486
hohnbaum@us.ibm.com T/L 775-5486

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:30    [W:0.150 / U:0.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site